[Znod]

Originally Posted by Midway

I have been looking around researching this and I found this statement:

Use FAT for anything UNDER 2GB.
Use FAT32 or NTFS for anything OVER 2GB.

But the general acceptance seems to be FAT.

Here are a couple of interesting links about ReadyBoost:

http://www.istartedsomething.com/200...dyboost-works/

http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/...boostanalyzed/

Thanks much. I am trying to figure out if FAT32 specifically would have any inherent advantage vis-a-vis NTFS when used with ReadyBoost.