Go Back   Windows Vista Forum | Vista Babble > Windows Vista > Vista News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2007, 08:09 PM
Snuffy's Avatar
Elite Members
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: S.W. Kansas
Posts: 2,841
Snuffy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Snuffy
Exclamation PIRATE'S - Sue MS OVER WGA


Chinese Student Sues Microsoft for Privacy Violation
A Beijing college student claims that Microsoft's antipiracy program violates his privacy, according to a Chinese government-controlled news site.
Gregg Keizer, Computerworld
Tuesday, September 18, 2007 12:00 PM PDT
parts of article read all of it: http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,13...1/article.html
Quote:
Lu's lawsuit said Microsoft's Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) antipiracy software posed a threat to his privacy and the security of his PC, which runs Windows XP. He also claimed that he was not properly informed before XP installed WGA Notifications, a separate program that flags counterfeit copies and nags users running pirated versions.
Quote:
At least one lawsuit has been filed against Microsoft in the U.S. over WGA. The June 2006 suit by Brian Johnson accused WGA of spyware-like behavior, and argued that Microsoft had thus violated consumer and antispyware laws. That case is ongoing, but has not been scheduled for trial.

__________________
The only Stupid Question is the one you failed to Ask!
Beta Tester since Pre Win 95.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:39 PM
JoshW02@hotmail.co.uk's Avatar
Elite Members
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK-England
Posts: 1,024
JoshW02@hotmail.co.uk is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to JoshW02@hotmail.co.uk

Question. Why "PIRATES" in the title? Just because "he was not properly informed before XP installed WGA Notifications, a separate program that flags counterfeit copies and nags users running pirated versions", don't automaticly mean he was running an illegal product. He could just be unhappy that MS installed it with his notice. Unless I am wrong or being to trusting to people I don't think he should be auto classed as an illegal software runner. What Do you think?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2007, 12:25 AM
Snuffy's Avatar
Elite Members
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: S.W. Kansas
Posts: 2,841
Snuffy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Snuffy
Talking

Again this depends on how you (not a lawyer) reads and understands the EULA.

By reading all the (several) posts and links around, he claims he is a "PIRATE" and the Downloads were installed w/o his permission, which in turn shut his version of XP down to limited access.

Now you would have to go to the chinesse with, load a transulator and read carefully. He does not " explain" in perfect english... but it (IMHO) translates to "he was/is using a illegal version of Windows XP".

He is only sueing for US Dollars $179.00....
__________________
The only Stupid Question is the one you failed to Ask!
Beta Tester since Pre Win 95.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08 AM.



Page generated in 0.15324 seconds with 11 queries

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23