![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| I find that my desktop is consistently slower when I let Windows choose what is best than when I select best appearance. I would get an Optimized (or Enhanced, whichever) for Vista flash drive rather than use a card. Even fairly large flash drives are inexpensive now. But, as others have said, more RAM is a better idea. My experience is that defragging excessively can slow a machine down as compared to defragging only when the fragmentation percentage is allowed to increase to a point. While this observation does not make much sense on the surface, I only degrag when I suspect that a performance degradation has occurred and my fragmentation percent is "high." I don't have a ready guideline for when it is too high--maybe 15 to 20 %.
__________________ Last edited by Znod : 03-08-2007 at 04:06 AM. |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
__________________ The only Stupid Question is the one you failed to Ask! Beta Tester since Pre Win 95. |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
| could you post the reply, reason I ask is I know of at least two MS MVP that would like to know who told you that...and in what reference they told you. I mentioned I'd ask you to post the Email or at sent to me (PM) with what ever removed to protect your privacy..and with your permission forward to them. Thanks
__________________ The only Stupid Question is the one you failed to Ask! Beta Tester since Pre Win 95. |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| Hi Sorry it wasn`t in a email it was on the phone support line... :S..
__________________ Mustangman76 |Pentium M Centrino 1.60 GHZ|100GB HD|ATI Mobility Radeon X300|19 Inch LCD Widescreen|512 MB Ram|CDRW/DVD Rom| |